GEORGIA
Allegations Of Ill-treatment In Detention (update to information in AI Index:
EUR 56/02/98 and EUR 01/01/99)
Issues of alleged ill-treatment remained topical during the
period under review. In January the General Procurator's Office is said to have
reported that during the previous year 700 employees of the law enforcement
agencies were disciplined for violations, and that 14 criminal cases had been
initiated against police officers for beating detainees under investigation.
Unofficial sources have continued to complain, however, that often the prosecution
refuses to initiate proceedings, or if they do then such proceedings rarely
result in the cases being brought to trial. Giorgi Shiukashvili, for example,
alleges that following his arrest in January 1998 on suspicion of stealing wheels
he was severely beaten over a period of 15 days in Gldani district police station,
Tbilisi, until he signed a confession to that and several other crimes he did
not commit. He was then transferred to an investigation prison and was reportedly
virtually unable to move for the first two weeks, a condition observed by 18
other detainees in his cell. When his case came to trial in January this year
Giorgi Shiukashvili was acquitted and released from custody in the courtroom,
reportedly in part because of the allegations of torture. Although a criminal
case was said to have been opened against two police officers for physically
assaulting him, relatives allege that there have been no vigorous efforts to
pursue the prosecution of the officers concerned. They further allege that Giorgi
Shiukashvili was briefly detained on 25 May at Mtatsminda district police station,
and that an officer there threatened to force him out of Tbilisi unless "he
stopped fighting against the police".
On 21 September 1998 three members of the Liberty Institute,
a non-governmental organization involved in human rights monitoring, were reportedly
beaten in Tbilisi by members of the Special Police Unit (SPU) of the Ministry
of Internal Affairs. Two, journalists named Gogi Kavtaradze and Kote Vardzelashvili,
were said to have been physically assaulted, verbally abused and threatened
with rape while being transported in an SPU van to Chugureti District Police
Station. At the station Kote Vardzelashvili is said to have been assaulted again
by the head of the SPU. A third colleague, Sandro Zhuruli, is said to have been
beaten by SPU officers after he arrived at the police station seeking information
on those detained. Members of the Liberty Institute complained to the prosecutor's
office, but no prosecutions were forthcoming as two police officers said to
have been in the van denied the allegations. On 10 November 1998 the same SPU
head was said to have involved in the beating of another journalist, Aleko Tskitishvili,
in front of several bystanders after the reporter tried to enter the Supreme
Court building where a major political trial was concluding. In February it
was reported that the Mtatsminda district procurator's office had concluded
their investigation into the allegations in this case, and that no criminal
charges would be brought against the SPU head owing to a lack of evidence.
Among the further allegations of ill-treatment received during
the period under review was that six men detained in connection with a robbery
near Kutaisi had been ill-treated in police custody in order to obtain confessions.
"Political prisoners for Human Rights", a non-governmental (NGO) organization
investigating the allegations, named five of the men as Temur Khaburzania, Ramaz
Khantadze, Kvantaliani, Giorgadze, Lipartiani (first names of the last three
are not known). According to the NGO, on the evening of 24 January 1999 a man
was robbed near Kutaisi. He reported the incident to the regional police department
of Kutaisi and shortly afterwards policemen from this department, along with
colleagues from Tskhaltubo, detained two groups of three men and brought them
to the Kutaisi regional police station. When the NGO, alerted by the lawyer
of one of the men, arrived in Tskhaltubo on 28 January, two of the men, Ramaz
Khantadze and Temur Khaburzania had been released by the court there. They had
swellings around their eyes and blood on their clothes and appeared to have
been beaten.
In an interview with a correspondent from the newspaper Resonance,
Ramaz Khantadze reported that while in custody police officers slapped him in
the face, causing his nose to bleed, and beat him in the ribs and shins. He
claimed that the investigating officer dictated a confession to him. Temur Khaburzania
reported that he had been beaten by police officers in order to force him to
confess to the robbery.
The NGO asked to see at least one of the other men still detained.
Kvantaliani emerged, but was completely covered up, wearing a hat and scarf
and long sleeves. He refused to stay to speak to the NGO representative or his
lawyer, although in an earlier interview with his lawyer he had stated that
he had been brutally beaten on the legs and feet by a named police officer and
had displayed wounds on his legs consistent with this allegation. The police
claimed that none of the detainees wished to speak to the NGO or their lawyers.
The police deny that any ill-treatment took place, claiming that the men's injuries
were caused in a fight among themselves which took place prior to the robbery.
Three men complained to Elene Tevdoradze, of the parliamentary
Commission on Human Rights, about alleged ill-treatment in March while held
at investigation-isolation prison No. 5 in Tbilisi. On 11 May she met with one
of them, Adin Musayev, while he was in the republican hospital. He alleged that
over two nights around 20 to 24 March law enforcement officials beat him, placed
a gas mask over his head and turned the air supply off, subjected him to electric
shocks and finally threatened him with rape using a bottle and filmed him in
this position.
Failure To Implement Law On Civilian Alternative To Military
Service (update to information in AI Index: EUR 01/01/99)
Amnesty International again approached the Georgian authorities
about their failure to implement the law on alternative service, which should
have come into force from 1 January 1998. It is reported, for example, the Georgian
authorities have yet to establish any decision-making procedures for applying
the civilian alternative to compulsory military service. Amnesty International
also expressed concern about other aspects of the law itself, which appear not
to conform to recommendations by international bodies of which Georgia is a
member. The organization understands, for example, that the new legislation
does not make absolutely clear that any alternative service should be completely
civilian in nature and separate from military structures. In Chapter 3, Article
18, for example, the law stipulates that "after demobilization from alternative
non-military labour service citizens are enlisted in the reserve until 50 years
of age", suggesting that they may be liable to subsequent mobilization
within the military.
Amnesty International also understands that although the law
provides for the possibility for those performing alternative service to transfer
to military service, there is no corresponding provision for those performing
military service to transfer to an alternative civilian one (for example should
they develop a conscientious objection following conscription).
In addition the organization is concerned that the length of
alternative labour service, at 36 months, is a year longer than the 24 months
set for compulsory military service - the law already stipulates that "the
nature of the alternative non-military labour service must conform with the
difficulties of the general military service" (Chapter 1, Article 2). Amnesty
International sought clarification on the reasons why alternative labour service
is 12 months longer, including what measures were taken to ensure that this
length is not punitive.
Fair Trial Concerns - Guram Absandze
Amnesty International approached the Georgian authorities about
the case of Guram Absandze, a minister in the government of former President
Zviad Gamsakhurdia, who was forcibly returned to Georgia from Russia on 19 March
1998 (the organization had opposed his return, see AI Index: EUR 01/02/98, Russia
entry). The charges against him reportedly include embezzlement, relating to
his previous term as a minister in the Gamsakhurdia government, as well as treason
and banditry in connection with the attempted assassination of President Eduard
Shevardnadze on 9 February 1998 and events in the west of Georgia in 1992 and
1993.
During the period under review the prosecution completed the
case against Guram Absandze, and 12 co-defendants, and passed a reported 71
volumes of material on the case to the Supreme Court on 14 May 1999 for a trial
date to be set. However, Guram Absandze's defence lawyer claimed that he and
his client had time to review properly only 10 of those 71 volumes before the
expiry of a time limit of 12 April. The lawyer, Malykhaz Dzhangirashvili, also
alleged that his requests for an extension of the time limit were turned down
three times, and that on 4 May he was excluded from taking a further part in
the investigation by the official heading it.
Amnesty International sought further information on these allegations,
and on what mechanisms for appeal may exist for the defendants if convicted
given that the case was set to be heard by the Supreme Court of Georgia as court
of first instance.
Concerns In The Disputed Region of Abkhazia
Detention Of The Crew Of The Alioni
On 3 or 4 April the crew of a Georgian fishing boat named Alioni,
from the port of Poti, were detained by Abkhazian border guards for allegedly
"violating the sea border of Abkhazia", and taken to Sukhumi. The
only female member, Nato Kvirkvelia, was released on or around 15 April, but
the remaining nine crew members were still in detention at the end of the period
under review. According to reports received by Amnesty International, the captain
and the chief mechanic of the Alioni were to be charged with illegally entering
Abkhazian waters, and the remaining crew with fishing illegally in a conservation
area. It was unclear, however, when and what formal charges were laid, if any.
Moreover, officials from the Abkhazian side were quoted as saying that the crew
members could be released without any further legal proceedings, in exchange
for four Abkhazian civilians said to have been captured in the Gali region by
Georgian irregular armed forces.
In approaching the Abkhazians, Amnesty International sought
further details on what provisions had been made to ensure that the men detained
had been informed promptly and in a language which they understood of the nature
and cause of the charges against them, and whether they had been granted access
to a defence lawyer of their own choice. The organization's main concern, however,
was that if the nine crew members were indeed being held without formal charge,
with their release conditional on an exchange for others, then in effect they
were being held in the capacity of hostages. International standards prohibit
the taking or holding of hostages in all circumstances.
Alleged Ill-treatment
During the period under review Amnesty International also raised
several cases in which it was alleged that Abkhazian forces had been involved
in the ill-treatment, robbery or deaths of ethnic Georgians. The organization
stressed it was aware that many reports on events from the Gali district, for
example, could be extremely polarized, and welcomed any assessment or clarification
of these events from the Abkhaz side including, if the reports were accurate,
what steps were being taken to ensure comprehensive and impartial investigations,
with the results made public and those responsible brought to justice.
Allegations received included the following. Two Georgian families,
that of Revaz Djakhia in the village of Saberio and that of Djaniko Markhulia
in Parto Nokhori, Gali district, were said to have been robbed and beaten on
7 January by Abkhazian gunmen. At around the same time the residents of Charcha
village reported that they were threatened with deportation unless they provided
regular food and a monthly payment to Abkhazian forces. On 6 May 1999 it was
reported that Abkhaz forces had arrested brothers Mamuka and Manuchar Darsania,
who had travelled from Zugdidi to the village of Mziuri in the Gali district,
as well as two other men related to them who were named as Omar Gvagvalia and
Raul Badzaghua. The four men were said to have been taken to Sukhumi remand
prison, where Mamuka Darsania was reportedly ill-treated during questioning
about his alleged involvement with Georgian irregular armed forces.
Activities Of Georgian Irregular Forces
(update to information in AI Index: EUR 56/02/98)
During the period under review Amnesty International again
approached the Georgian authorities about concerns relating to the activity
of illegal Georgian armed formations in and around Abkhazia.
Such formations are said to have been responsible for the abduction
of Abkhazian service personnel and civilians, and for holding them as hostages.
For example it was reported that the bodies of three Abkhazian civilians named
as Eduard, Shota and Arutan Gvaramia were said to have been found on 18 January
this year. The three men, from the village of Bedia in Tqvarcheli district,
were said to have been taken hostage in December 1998 in the village of Churburkhinji,
Gali district. The Abkhazian authorities claimed Georgian illegal armed groups
were responsible, and that at that time three Abkhazian servicemen from the
Gali Commandant's Office were still being held as hostages by such groups. There
were also reports of four Abkhazian civilians said to have been abducted by
Georgian illegal armed groups in the Gali district and to be held by them as
hostages in Georgian-controlled territory, whose release the Abkhazians were
reportedly seeking in exchange for the crew of the fishing vessel Alioni (see
above). The Abkhazian side further alleged that the details of these four men
are known to the Georgian State Commission for Prisoner Exchanges, who had proposed
their exchange for three ethnic Georgians sentenced to 13 years' imprisonment
in Abkhazia.
Amnesty International is aware that the Georgian authorities
have repeatedly denied any links with or support, financial or otherwise, to
illegal armed groups. The organization is also aware of the difficulties in
identifying members of semi-clandestine, illegal armed formations, and many
measures being taken may, for security reasons, remain secret. However, beyond
a simple denial of any connections between the government and armed formations,
Amnesty International has received no indication of substantive measures being
taken to investigate the alleged complicity of some of those in authority in
Georgia in the arming and operation of these groups, or of concrete steps being
taken to apprehend known individuals who have claimed involvement. The organization
has again urged that all appropriate steps be taken to ensure that anyone within
Georgian jurisdiction responsible for human rights abuses in Abkhazia is apprehended
and brought to justice.
The Return Of The Civilian Population
(update to information in AI Index: EUR 56/02/98)
The security situation remained tense, in part as a result
of the activities of irregular armed groups - including mine laying - and of
general lawlessness. On 1 March the Abkhazian side unilaterally began implementation
of a refugee return programme to the Gali district, but this was regarded with
reservations by the international community and the Georgian side owing to the
perceived lack of guarantees for the safety and security of the returnees. In
a statement on 7 May, the United Nations Security Council demanded that both
sides put a stop to the activities of armed groups and establish a climate of
confidence allowing refugees and displaced persons to return. The Council reaffirmed
the imprescriptible right of all refugees and displaced persons affected by
the conflict to return to their homes in secure conditions.
Ratifications:
On 22 March 1999 Georgia acceded to the Second Optional Protocol
to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aimed at abolition
of the death penalty
On 17 June Georgia signed Protocol Six of the European Convention on Human
Rights, which outlaws the death penalty.
|