Untitled Document
Press Release
HR/4753
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
Third Session
9th & 10th Meetings (AM & PM)
SPEAKERS HIGHLIGHT VIOLATIONS OF INDIGENOUS WOMEN’S RIGHTS, NEED TO ADOPT
DECLARATION ON INDIGENOUS RIGHTS, AS PERMANENT FORUM CONTINUES SESSION
As the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues continued its discussion of human
rights today, speakers highlighted grave human rights abuses committed against
indigenous women, by both foreign armies and patriarchs in their own societies,
and stressed the urgent need to adopt the United Nations draft declaration on
the rights of indigenous peoples.
Erica-Irene Daes, Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Promotion and
Protection of Human Rights, Commission on Human Rights, noted that rape and
sexual abuse had been systematically used to intimidate and traumatize indigenous
women and families in police interrogations, civil wars and armed conflict.
An estimated 170 million indigenous women worldwide suffered widespread discrimination
and other gross abuses, she said, adding that certain States deliberately ignored
flagrant violations against indigenous women or against whole indigenous communities.
The Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia
and Rwanda had pegged rape during wartime -– for the first time ever --
as a crime against humanity, she continued. Moreover, the Statute of the International
Criminal Court included an important provision on “rape, sexual slavery,
enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization or any other
forms of sexual violence or comparable gravity”. She urged States to implement
relevant international and humanitarian norms to guarantee indigenous women’s
rights, especially in times of armed conflict.
Extending that theme to peacetime, Yakin Erturk, Special Rapporteur on Violence
against Women, Commission on Human Rights, said indigenous women suffered from
oppression, subordination, and patriarchal gender orders in the home, community
and State organs. Pointing to major contradictions between group norms -–
which might actually condone subjugation or violence against women -- and individual
rights, she said oppression in the home was a particular problem, since it was
often overlooked and justified as a private matter.
The work of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women,
along with several United Nations conferences, had helped demystify the public-private
distinction that was keeping women out of the mainstream, she said. It was time
to tackle notions that controlling and regulating women were the only means
to sustain tradition, or that a man could batter his wife in the name of cultural
honour.
During the discussion on human rights, several participants noted that divergent
views on the balance between collective and individual rights were hindering
agreement on the draft declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, and
urged the working group to overcome such obstacles as soon as possible. Others
recommended that United Nations and human rights bodies carry out fact-finding
missions in areas where gross violations of indigenous rights had been committed,
work with international tribunals to end impunity for genocides, and end terror
campaigns aimed at repressing indigenous peoples.
Drawing attention to specific horrors within her country, a member of the Bangsa
Adat Alifuru pointed to acts of genocide that the Indonesian military was committing
against indigenous people in Moluccu. She called for the immediate withdrawal
of Indonesian military forces, and for a United Nations fact-finding mission
to report on the true situation. Similarly, a representative of the Montagnard
Foundation called for the United Nations to send human rights monitors to the
central highlands of Viet Nam, where indigenous peoples were suffering gross
violations of their rights.
Also today, a presentation was made by the representative of the International
Labour Organization (ILO), who noted that discussions of human rights abuses
against indigenous people had expanded to issues of development. Too often,
he said, indigenous people either lost their traditional lands, or were given
no opportunity to consult on how development could harmonize with their continued
existence. He encouraged the United Nations to build respect for indigenous
rights into development activities, and governments to take active measures
to correct such violations.
The Forum will meet again at 10 a.m. on Monday, 17 May, to continue its discussion
of human rights.
Background
The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues met today to continue its discussion
of human rights. (For background information on the Forum’s third session,
see Press Release HR/4741 of 4 May.)
Discussion
YAKIN ERTURK, Special Rapporteur of the United Nations Commission on Human
Rights on Violence against Women, said indigenous women were struggling, sometimes
at great risk, to improve the lives of their peoples, making the world aware
of the great wrongs committed throughout civilized history. A major problem
they faced were contradictions that arose between group rights and universal
norms. Indigenous women had suffered from oppression, subordination, and patriarchal
gender orders, which had subdued them in the home, community and State apparatus.
Oppression in the home was one of the most difficult situations to address,
since it had often been overlooked, and justified as a private matter.
The outcomes of various United Nations conferences and the work of the Committee
on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women were major breakthroughs
in demystifying the public-private distinction that was keeping women excluded
from the mainstream, she said. Since the “Beijing plus 5” conference,
national and international funding had been directed towards improving women’s
position, and relevant texts on women had been negotiated in international forums.
It was time to tackle notions that controlling and regulating women were the
only means to sustain tradition, or that a man could batter his wife in the
name of cultural honour. Human rights standards were clear. The United Nations
mandate on gender equality aimed to correct historic wrongs aimed at subduing
half of the world’s population. The human rights discourse was a vital
approach in considering the rights of individuals or groups.
ERICA-IRENE DAES, Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Promotion and
Protection of Human Rights, Commission on Human Rights, noted that an estimated
170 million indigenous women worldwide faced poverty and cultural marginalization,
as well as widespread discrimination and other gross and systematic human rights
abuses. Certain States deliberately ignored flagrant violations of human rights
against indigenous women and, in certain cases, against whole indigenous communities.
In situations ranging from police interrogations to civil wars and armed conflict,
the rape and sexual abuse of indigenous women was used to systematically intimidate
and traumatize women and families. Violence against indigenous women disregarded
basic human rights and fundamental freedoms, and was an affront to women’s
inherent human dignity. Physical, psychological and sexual violence against
indigenous women and girls, in public and private, plagued all societies and
classes and posed tremendous obstacles to equality, development, peace and security.
The Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
and Rwanda characterized the crime of rape during wartime -– for the first
time in history -- as a crime against humanity, she continued. The Statute of
the International Criminal Court included an important provision relating to
“rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization or any other forms of sexual violence of comparable gravity”.
States should be encouraged to adopt measures to implement relevant international
law and humanitarian norms, to guarantee respect for indigenous women’s
human rights, especially in times of armed conflict.
Turning to the Forum’s work, she said it would win serious political
and economic support, and would serve as a system-wide coordination and evaluation
body under the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) -- not simply as an advisory
and policy forum. Benefits in the areas of development, reconciliation and partnership
would arise from that transition. As for development, a large portion of the
more than $2 billion spent on United Nations operational programmes each year
was devoted to regions with large indigenous populations. The United Nations
system should review the positive impacts of technical and financial assistance
in regions where indigenous peoples lived, ensuring that they participated fully
and freely in designing and benefiting from projects.
With respect to reconciliation, she added, the Forum could serve as a clearing
house of useful experiences in reconciliation and nation building, and actually
help facilitate communication and build trust between governments and indigenous
peoples. Regarding partnership, there were important advantages to building
true partnerships, in which indigenous peoples freely contributed their traditional
knowledge, creativity and unique cultural and artistic heritage.
Responding to the statement made by Ms. Daes, a member of the Forum agreed
that there was a need to enhance the financial assistance given to United Nations
programmes to help them move beyond recommendations to concerted action. A partnership
in action should be developed between indigenous communities themselves; between
indigenous peoples and State governments; and, at the international level, between
indigenous peoples and intergovernmental organizations.
Another Forum member said he wished to note the situation in Peru, where the
significant number of indigenous individuals that had fallen victim to the old
regime had not been adequately reflected in the report on that subject to the
Commission on Human Rights. The delegations assembling such reports should include
indigenous representatives.
Canada’s representative said that, during this final year of the International
Decade on Indigenous Peoples, the major human rights issue facing indigenous
peoples and the United Nations would be the need to make substantive progress
on the United Nations draft declaration on indigenous peoples. Both States and
representatives of indigenous people would have to show flexibility and the
willingness to achieve consensus on a strong and effective document. Among the
particularly difficult issues regarding indigenous rights was the need to balance
respect for individual rights with respect for collective rights.
A representative of the Pacific Region Consultation cited the legacies of colonialism
and military supremacy, the imposition of inherited colonial systems, the imposition
of foreign cultures and commodities above traditional values, and the use of
Western education as a tool to promote Western values as the onus under which
indigenous people laboured today. Pacific indigenous peoples remained continually
in conflict with foreign cultures, values and the concept of the supremacy of
the individual over collective rights. The United Nations should investigate
its own role in the colonization process, which had led to present-day human
rights violations in colonial occupied territories. It should also consider,
among other measures, the re-inscription of certain Pacific territories on the
list of non-self-governing territories, to give equal opportunity to indigenous
peoples to present evidence of violations of their fundamental rights to self-determination.
Responding to the foregoing comments, Ms. DAES acknowledged that indigenous
peoples should play a major role in every kind of negotiation between States,
and at the international level, that related to indigenous issues. It was time
for indigenous peoples to make themselves heard, time for their views to be
respected.
Several speakers stressed the importance of self-determination, recommending
that the Forum enshrine it as the most vital right for indigenous peoples. While
the need for self-determination had considerable international support, the
absence of political will in a few States had denied self-determination to indigenous
peoples living in their territories.
A representative of the International Labour Organization (ILO) noted that
human rights violations had originally brought indigenous issues under international
scrutiny. Now, that attention had progressed to discussions of indigenous rights
and development. Indigenous peoples were discriminated against in the working
world, and denied training that would improve their access to it. Instead, they
were often subjected to forced or bonded labour and child labour, which the
ILO was working to eliminate. The ILO had also developed instruments aimed at
restoring indigenous peoples’ traditional rights to land, as well as their
right to be consulted in development. All too often, they were given no opportunity
to express their views about how development should progress in a way that was
harmonious with their continued existence. He encouraged the United Nations
to build respect for indigenous rights into development activities, and governments
to take active measures to correct such violations.
Participants also described specific human rights violations that were occurring
in their countries. A member of the Bangsa Adat Alifuru described acts of alleged
genocide that the Indonesian military was committing against indigenous people
in Moluccu. She called for the immediate withdrawal of Indonesian military forces
from Moluccu, and for a United Nations fact-finding mission to report on the
true situation. Similarly, a representative of the Montagnard Foundation called
for the United Nations to send human rights monitors to the central highlands
of Viet Nam, where indigenous peoples were suffering gross violations of their
rights.
Representatives of African groups highlighted the effects of armed conflict
on indigenous women, and stressed the need to adopt a holistic, integrated approach
to promote the participation of women in resolving conflicts and building peace.
Most indigenous women in Africa were not allowed to take part in decision-making
processes, and lacked any freedom of expression. They were also denied the right
to land, the right to live in peace, and lacked resources to participate in
forums on human rights. Many lacked information about such instruments as the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women,
and the Beijing process.
Noting the approaching end of the International Decade of Indigenous Peoples,
the representative of Conclave de los Pueblos Indígenas de América
said indigenous peoples continued to suffer consistent violations of their human
rights and urged the Forum to recommend that ECOSOC pay attention to the situation
of extremely vulnerable peoples living in isolation; to urge governments to
respect international norms; to work with international tribunals to end impunity
for genocides and violations against the human rights of indigenous peoples;
and to end terror campaigns aimed at repressing indigenous peoples, in particular,
indigenous immigrants. The collective rights of indigenous peoples should be
internationally recognized.
New Zealand’s representative said the Forum should continue to look beyond
indigenous complaints in pursuit of improvement in the overall situation of
indigenous peoples worldwide. In particular, ensuring indigenous peoples enjoyment
of equal rights also meant ensuring that those rights applied equally to indigenous
men and women. In his own country’s experience, extensive territorial
and resource rights had been accorded to the Maori people. The new draft legislation
on the foreshore and seabed would allow all New Zealanders to apply for recognition
of their ancestral rights.
An indigenous representative from Brazil drew attention to the situation in
her country, where 23 indigenous leaders had been assassinated in 2003 for engaging
in the protection of their peoples’ rights. Furthermore, the indigenous
peoples of the Amazon faced threats to their continued existence from the invasion
of illegal miners, who had brought increased violence, particularly against
women and children, alcoholism and malaria. In response, the Forum should recommend
that Brazil formulate an indigenous policy recognizing the multicultural nature
of the State, and withdraw from indigenous territories and demarcate and register
them as indigenous territories.
Other speakers raised issues including the disproportionately high rate of
infant mortality among indigenous populations. That phenomenon was due to lack
of access to adequate health services suffered by indigenous women. The Forum
should recommend the allocation of a high level of resources to the health sector,
with specific consideration for indigenous peoples and indigenous women in particular.
Among other recommendations addressed to the Forum, the representative of the
Asian Indigenous Caucus said the body should urge the Secretary-General to formulate
guidelines and principles for the inclusion of indigenous peoples in the working
of the United Nations system, to enable them to participate in the formulation
of country-related notes and reports. The Forum should also encourage United
Nations agencies to establish capacity-building programmes aimed directly at
indigenous populations.
As the discussion on human rights continued in the afternoon, a number of recommendations
were made to the Forum, including that it encourage reform of the ILO system
and of the Commission on Human Rights to ensure representation and participation
of indigenous groups; urge the High Commissioner for Human Rights to promote
the human rights of indigenous peoples; recommend that the ECOSOC urge States
and the specialized agencies of the United Nations system to respect international
agreements ensuring indigenous rights; and organize activities with indigenous
peoples in the Pacific, Asia, Latin America, North America and the Arctic.
States were urged to respect indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination
by adopting the draft declaration on indigenous peoples; promote the establishment
of a second International Decade for Indigenous Peoples; and establish monitoring
mechanisms to track the implementation of Forum recommendations on human rights.
Other requests included that the Special Rapporteur for indigenous rights visit
Ecuador and that the Secretary-General provide necessary financial assistance
to indigenous women to participate in the working group on the negotiation of
the draft declaration on indigenous peoples.
The representative of the International Indigenous Women’s Caucus also
urged the Vatican to rescind the Papal Bulls, issued by Innocent IV in the thirteenth
century, which had laid the foundation for the doctrine of discovery and the
right of conquest that had ultimately facilitated colonization.
Responding to an earlier statement by the Government of New Zealand, an indigenous
delegate from the Pacific region said she felt it incumbent to disagree with
the attribution of responsibility for the stalemate in negotiations on the draft
declaration on indigenous peoples. Whereas New Zealand’s position was
that a handful of organizations refusing any change to the original text had
caused the recent breakdown in the negotiating process, those organizations
that had participated had noted that several articles of the draft text had
been close to adoption without change. The stalemate should be attributed to
the handful of States submitting blatantly discriminatory proposals for changes
to the draft declaration, and which sought changes so drastic that they would
undermined the document’s original intent.
MARISELA PADRON QUERO, Director, Latin America and the Caribbean Division of
the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), stressed that legal systems must
protect and enforce women’s rights, and that all forms of discrimination
and violence against women must be eliminated. For more than 30 years, the UNFPA
had been in the forefront of bringing greater attention to gender issues, promoting
legal and policy reforms and gender-sensitive data collection, and supporting
projects that empowered women economically. The UNFPA’s efforts had been
aimed at incorporating the perspectives, needs and rights of indigenous women
into the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the population,
development and environment programmes that affected them, to ensure they received
reproductive health services that were socially, culturally and ecologically
appropriate.
The UNFPA’s programmes focusing on indigenous peoples had attempted to
incorporate a gender perspective to respond to the very different needs of indigenous
women and men, and to address such issues as violence against women, she said.
Indigenous women and girls in many countries needed increased support to live
lives of dignity, with their human rights respected and their human needs met.
Laws and procedures must be reformed and existing rights protections better
enforced.
The UNFPA, she said, must continue supporting the empowerment of women to challenge
violations to their rights, and to help promote change in basic norms and institutions
of society. She recommended that a gender perspective be placed at the centre
of all policies and programmes affecting women’s health, particularly
indigenous women; that efforts for comprehensive and accessible health services
and programmes be expanded; and that governments strengthen national information
systems to produce reliable statistics.
Participants also recommended that United Nations and human rights bodies carry
out fact-finding missions in areas where gross violations of indigenous peoples’
rights had been committed, and request the Office of the High Commissioner and
United Nations bodies to strengthen implementation of human rights instruments.
One participant noted the continuing uncertainty of the United Nations declaration
on the rights of indigenous peoples, and said it was highly unlikely it would
be acceptable to indigenous peoples by the end of the decade. No other standard
setting activity within the United Nations had been as time-consuming. She suggested
that the current procedure to complete the declaration was inadequate, and that
an effective working method was needed.
Colombia’s delegate, also speaking on behalf of a Colombian indigenous
organization, described the situation of indigenous peoples in his country and
said that the territories of the last nomads of South America were being taken
away, their ecosystem altered and their heritage lost due to the ravages of
the war under way in Colombia. The different armed groups and narcotics traffickers
had forced indigenous peoples to take part in such activities and give up their
cultural identity. To combat such phenomena, it was suggested that those companies
producing goods such as alcohol, tobacco, weapons and oil, among others, should
commit 1 per cent of their yearly sales to funding indigenous priorities and
that States using fumigation systems against illicit crops should also dedicate
a part of their budgets to the same. Another suggestion was that the goods produced
by indigenous peoples should not be subject to taxation, but should be incorporated
into the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Other speakers drew attention to violations of the human rights of indigenous
peoples including, among others, by the Mexican military in Chiapas; by the
Government of Chile on Rapanui (Easter Island); by the Government of the United
States against the Hawaiian peoples; by the Government of Cameroon against the
Mbororo people; and by the Vietnamese Government against the Khmer Krom people
of South-East Asia.
Drawing attention to the plight of urbanized indigenous people in Canada, the
representative of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples said that those not living
on reservation lands, who constituted the majority of Canada’s indigenous
population, did not benefit from the country’s Indian Act and suffered
unacceptable levels of poverty, poor health and lack of education. Prime Minister
Martin’s assurance that redressing the situation of Canada’s indigenous
people figured as one of his top five priorities was welcomed, but must be proven
in practice as well. Among the ways in which the Forum should promote such reforms
was through the establishment of accountability scorecards for States as they
sought to rid themselves of discriminatory legislation.
The representative of the Asian Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Network drew
attention to the need to reform the working of the Permanent Forum, including
punctuality with regard to session start times and the logical limitation of
prayers and ceremonies; the perfunctory nature of applause after statements,
even for the statements of governments responsible for gross violations of indigenous
peoples’ human rights; and the need to rationalize the speakers’
list to avoid redundancy.
Also on the work of the Permanent Forum, the representative of the Foundation
for Aboriginal and Islander Research Action said there must be consideration
of whether the role of the Forum was conducive to holding States more accountable
for abuses committed against their indigenous people, and that the adoption
of the draft declaration on indigenous peoples should be supported by all governments
and indigenous groups.
In other areas, all country-specific and thematic Special Rapporteurs should
dedicate special attention to the situation of indigenous peoples. The International
Decade of Indigenous Peoples should also be extended for a second decade.
Participants lamented the effects of conflict situations, when indigenous women
and children were forced to become refugees, displaced from their ancestral
homes. They also objected to irresponsible logging in indigenous areas, which
led to deforestation, damming of ancestral waters, and multinationals being
allowed to buy indigenous land.
A representative of the Saami Parliamentary Council proposed that the Forum
urge States to establish decision-making bodies with indigenous women’s
issues on the agenda. Indigenous men and women would participate in such bodies,
which would also discuss land rights, education, health, environment, business,
and culture. Another speaker suggested that the issues of indigenous women be
included in national constitutions.
A representative of the Association of Nepalese Indigenous Journalists recommended
that the Forum promote the establishment of a media watch committee to ensure
that indigenous peoples were not unfairly portrayed by the media.
Source: UN
|