|
Untitled Document
WALTER KALIN, Representative of the Secretary-General on
the human rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs), said IDPs were distinguished
from other persons by the common types of vulnerability that displacement exposed
them to, as well as by their need for a durable solution to that displacement.
Studies on IDPs in recent years had shown that losing one's home meant more
than a simple loss of poverty and shelter - it frequently entailed consequences
such as increased vulnerability to violence, lack of the basic necessities of
life, as well as the threats of disease and impoverishment and other difficulties.
The human rights situation of IDPs in the world today continued to be of concern
to all. Most IDPs were trapped in protracted situations of displacement; neither
able to return to their homes nor effectively to put down new roots elsewhere.
The year 2004 had been overshadowed by the dramatic escalation
of the conflict in Sudan's Darfur region, which had uprooted close to two million
persons, among them some 1.7 million IDPs since the beginning of the conflict.
The Government of the Sudan should give serious consideration to the report
of the previous Representative on this, and his recommendations, to implement
the norms contained in the Guiding Principles, cooperate with the international
community in addressing the plight of the displaced, and end the climate of
impunity in Darfur as well as cooperate with the international community in
bringing those responsible for arbitrary displacement to justice. There was
also concern for the more than one million persons displaced by the earthquake
and tsunami in South Asia. A visit, while not an official country mission, was
held shortly after to the region. Now, the main recommendation was that in the
reconstruction and recovery phase, it was essential to take a human rights-based
approach to the response so as to prevent future possible problems or violations.
The report before the Commission outlined ways in which the
specific needs of those displaced could be addressed, and how the protection
of the human rights of IDPs could be improved. Mainstreaming of human rights
of the internally displaced into all relevant parts of the United Nations system
was also a crucial element. States had the primary responsibility to provide
protection and assistance to IDPs. Country missions would therefore be a central
part of the activities of the Special Rapporteur in the future, and he would
visit Nepal very shortly, and intended to visit Serbia and Montenegro, Croatia,
and Bosnia and Herzegovina over the course of the year.
Response by Concerned Country
HASABU M. ABDULRAHMAN (Sudan), speaking as a concerned country,
said Sudan had studied the report of the former Representative of the Secretary-General
on the human rights of internally displaced persons, Francis Deng, and appreciated
the positive aspects of the report. The complex situation, including drought
and other calamities, had added to the worsening conditions of the displaced
persons. The Government had dispatched trained people to take care of the displaced
persons in Sudan. The African Union had also been involved in the situation
in Darfur. The Government had continued to demonstrate positive attitudes to
international organizations and the African Union. Some of the recommendations
had been for the disarmament of the militia. There was no discrimination against
the people of African origin. The report had said that Arabism and Islamism
had been the main causes of the problem in the region, which was not true. A
national commission of inquiry had been set up by the Government to investigate
the violations committed in the region and a number of people had been assigned
to protect displaced persons in their camps. It was not true that the problem
in Darfur was an ethnic issue. The Government had signed an agreement with UNHCR
with regard to returnees.
The Government had a framework policy concerning refugees and
displaced persons. Those peoples enjoyed all rights upon their return to their
places of origin. They were well received upon their return without any discrimination.
The international community should help the Government of Sudan in its efforts
to resolve the problem and carry out a process of reconciliation.
Source: Reliefweb
|