Oral Statement delivered by Tenzin Samphel KAYTA on behalf of Society for Threatened Peoples International

61st Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights
5 April 2005

Item 11: Civil and Political Rights

Mr. Chairman,

Whilst the People's Republic of China has now ratified some of the International Conventions, it has still to ratify one of the most significant international human rights instruments, that is, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The US State Department's recent publication, "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004", reported that China's human rights record in the Tibetan areas of China has "remained poor". The report also highlighted that the Chinese authorities "continued to commit serious human rights abuses, including extra-judicial killing, torture, arbitrary arrest, detention without public trial, and lengthy detention of Tibetans for peacefully expressing their political or religious views."

China has been reluctant to allow independent international and domestic NGOs to monitor human rights conditions within its borders. Visits by inter-governmental organs have, also, proven unsuccessful. In its mission report to this Commission following its visit to Beijing, Sichuan and the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) in September 2004, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention expressed concern that none of the recommendations made in its earlier reports had been implemented by the Chinese.

The visits of the UN Special Rapporteurs on Torture and Religious Intolerance, although agreed to by the Chinese Government, have yet to take place. We urge this Commission to encourage China to facilitate these two visits at the earliest opportunity.

China has continued its previous strategy of releasing a few political prisoners in order to prevent condemnation from the international community at the UN Commission on Human Rights. This positive gesture should not automatically be construed as a sign of the improvement of human rights conditions in China.

Mr. Chairman, China's international image suffers considerable damage as a result of the poor observance of human rights in its country. Moreover, the continuation of violations inside China, serve as a sharp rebuttal to those who believe that China is changing for the better. To revive its image internationally and prove that it is a responsible member of the international community, China must respect International Human Rights Law and uphold its own assertion of respecting and safeguarding human rights.

According to China Information Center on 30 March 2005, "Tibetan Culture, a website run by the Xueyu Zangren Cultural Exchange Co. Ltd in China's northwest Gansu Province, was closed on March 25, by the Internet Administration Department of the Public Security Bureau of Lanzhou." It is speculated that "sensitive topics" and articles posted by surfers have led to the close down. Tsewang Norbu, a Tibetan who is the writer and editor-in-chief of the website, is reported to be disappeared.

As members of the Commission may be aware, direct ties between the Dalai Lama and the Beijing authorities were renewed in 2002. Envoys of the Dalai Lama have visited China three times over the last three years. On the 10th March remembrance day, the Dalai Lama stated: " I once again want to reassure the Chinese authorities that as long as I am responsible for the affairs of Tibet, we remain fully committed to the Middle Way Approach of not seeking independence for Tibet and are willing to remain with People´s Republic of China".

The Society for Threatened Peoples urges the Commission to take note of the Dalai Lama's overture and to encourage China to formalise regular visits by his envoys. Such dialogue is the necessary precursor to any substantive negotiations and to finding a peaceful and lasting solution to the future status of Tibet and its people.

Thank you

Oral Statement made by Norzin Dolma on behalf of International Fellowship of Reconciliation.

61st Session of the UN Commission on Human rights
5 April 2005

Item 11e: Civil & Political Rights including the question of Religious Intolerance

Mr. Chairman,

For the past several years, the International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR) has regularly reported on matters concerning the gross and systematic violation of religious freedom in Tibet to the members of this commission.

This year we would like to draw attention to the publication of a booklet, entitled "Strike Hard Campaign: China's Crackdown on Political Dissidence, by the Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD). The TC HRD has produced an authoritative account of the strategy and tactics employed by Chinese government officials to suppress political dissidence in Tibet.

In April 1996, the Chinese government launched the "Strike Hard" campaign in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR). Although in other parts of China the campaing was designed to combat crime, in Tibet it was directed against "splittist activity" and focused on the suppression of political dissent in religious institutions.

A major instrument of control in connection with the campaign has been "patriotic re-education". The purpose of "patriotic re-education" is to adapt Tibetan Buddhism to socialist norms and to enforce regulations governing the management of monasteries and convents and the registration of resident clergy. Although the initial "Strike Hard" campaign officially ended in July 1996, in Tibet the campaign continued under the cover of "patriotic re-education".

In practice, "patriotic re-education" is conducted by work teams, recruited from the Public Security Bureau, who visit religious institutions for extended periods of time and instruct the monks and nuns on the "proper" understanding of Tibetan religion and history. In the course of their training sessions, the teams strive to identify and expel those clergy members whom they deem unpatriotic and to extract loyalty pledges from the rest. The five-point loyalty oath includes a statement regarding the historical unity of Tibet and China, a denunciation of the Dalai lama, and the recognition of the Chinese appointed Panchen Lama. The work teams also establish "Democratic Management Committees" within the institutions whose task it is to monitor activities and to ensure that regulations put in place by the work teams are carried out.

The campaign has also introduced a number of other restrictive measures. It has imposed a ban on admitting monks and nuns under the age of 18 years and enforces a mandatory retirement age of 65 years. All other clergy are required to register with the local Democratic Management Committees which set a ceiling on the number of monks and nuns allowed to stay and study at the convents.

According to Chinese government sources, by September 1997, work teams had visited virtually all of the 1'787 monasteries and temples registered in Tibet and had "re-education" at least 30'000 of the estimated 46,000 monks and nuns had been expelled from their religious institutions, while 294 had been arrested with 14 deaths reported. In addition, at least six religious institutions were completely closed down.

In December 1997, the "patriotic re-education" campaign was extended to lay communities with work teams operating in agricultural communities, towns, cities, government organs, and schools. In 1998, the campaign was furthered extended to Tibetan religious institutions and lay communities in Qinghai, Sichuan and Gansu provinces. In 2000, the Chinese government announced that the "patriotic re-education" campaign had concluded.

In April 2001, however, the "Strike Hard" campaign was officially re-launched in the TAR and was extended to other Tibetan areas in China. One of the most dramatic interventions involved the Serthar Tibetan Buddhist Institute, located in Kardze Prefecture, Sichuan Province. Claiming overcrowding and unsanitary conditions, the local authorities issued an expulsion order for more than 7'000 resident students. Work teams carried out the order and eventually more than one thousand dwellings were destroyed and thousands of monks and nuns evicted.

By August 2004, the total number of number of resident clergy expelled from their institutions during the eight years of the campaign was estimated at 11'383.

Since its initial implementation in 1996, the "Strike Hard" campaign has had serious implications for the freedom of religion and belief in Tibet. "Patriotic re-education" has involved systematic measures of control over the religious community, including restrictions on teaching, mandatory loyalty oaths, expulsions, arbitrary arrest and detention, interrogation by torture, even death. Given the extent of the restrictions, especially those measures affecting the religious education of youth below the age of 18 years, the future of the Tibetan monastic tradition itself is in question.

In conclusion, the IFOR calls upon the members of the Commission:
to condemn the grave and systematic violation of religious freedom in Tibet;

to request the Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Religion and Belief to visit -China with a view to investigate the effects of the campaign of "patriotic re-education" on religious and lay communities in Tibet.

Source: Phayul